CARI-Australia
November 2003 |
-
Estimation of GFR every three months from a value of
30mL/min/1.73m2 and monthly from a GFR ‹ 10 mL/min/1.73 m2.
- A valid estimate of GFR should be used to monitor renal
function. The recommended method is the mean of urea and
creatinine clearances which provides a more accurate estimate of
glomerular filtration than calculated creatinine clearance
alone.
Certain GFR equations that take into account serum creatinine and patient variables are sufficiently clinical useful.
MDRD 4 variable and 6 variable and Cockrouft Gault provide reliable eGFR
Clinical laboratory's should use an eGFR together with serum creatinine
eGFR are generally more reliable than creatinine clearance measurements
eGFR can be unreliable in certain circumstances
No data that cystatin C is better than eGFR |
Guidelines: Part 1-Dialysis Guidelines. Acceptance onto
dialysis
3. Measurement of renal function in the chronic renal failure
patient
For rationale, each time read below the guidelines.
1. Use of serum creatinine concentration to assess level
of kidney function
2. Use of estimated glomerular filtration rate to assess level
of kidney function
3. Use of cystatin C
|
Level C
Evidence
Level B Evidence
The ‘gold standard’ technique is measurement of inulin
clearance.
Residual renal function may also be expressed as Kt/V.
Evidence level III
Evidence level III
Evidence level III |
CSN-Canada
1999 |
- Measure
or calculate creatinine clearance for all patients with a serum
creatinine > 200µmol/L (2.3 mg/dL).
- Measure creatinine clearance using a 24-h urine collection and
a serum creatinine or calculate it using the Cockroft-Gault
formula.
- Measure renal function in patients with a creatinine clearance
<30mL/min using the mean of urea and creatinine clearance
(corrected to a body surface of 1.73m2).
-Measure renal function at least every 3 months. |
Guideline 1.1 Referral for management of renal failure
P 3 of 35 PDF pages
Guideline 1.2 Managing patients with a creatinine clearance <30ml/min
P 3 of 35 PDF pages
|
Opinion.
Evidence level I.
Evidence level I. |
EBPG-Europe
2002 |
- Renal
function should not be measured with blood urea or creatinine
alone. Cockroft and Gault or reciprocal creatinine plots should
not be used when GFR <30mL/min or to determine the need for
dialysis.
- GFR should only be estimated using a validated method in
patients with advanced renal failure. The preferred methods are
the MDRD equation and the mean of urea and creatinine clearance.
The latter is best calculated from a 24-h urine collection and
normalized to 1.73m2.
-Other validated GFR estimations are indicator decay methods (inulin
and EDTA) and creatinine clearance after oral cimetidine. |
Guideline I.1 Measurement of renal function |
Evidence
level A.
Evidence level B. |
KDOQI-US
February 2004 |
- Estimates
of GFR are the best overall indices of the level of kidney
function. The level of GFR should be estimated from prediction
equations that take into account the serum creatinine
concentration and some or all of the following variables: age,
gender, race, and body size.
-In adults, the MDRD Study and Cockcroft-Gault equations are
useful estimates. The serum creatinine concentration alone
should not be used to assess the level of kidney function.
- Clinical laboratories should report an estimate of GFR using a
prediction equation and should use international standard
methods for creatinine measurement.
- Measurement of creatinine clearance using 24-h urine
collections does not improve the estimate of GFR over that
provided by prediction equations. A 24-hour urine sample
provides useful information for estimation of GFR in individuals
with exceptional dietary intake or muscle mass, assessment of
diet and nutritional status, need to start dialysis. |
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease:
Evaluation, classification and stratification
Part 5: Evaluation of laboratory measurements for clinical
assessment of kidney disease.
Guideline 4: Estimation of GFR
|
Inulin
clearance is the golden standard.
Among adults, the MDRD Study equation provides a clinically
useful estimate of GFR (up to approximately 90 mL/min/1.73 m2)
The MDRD is standardized for body surface area. |
UK-Guidelines
August 2002 |
The most
valued measure of renal function is the GFR which can only be
measured using complex clearance studies (eg inulin). |
Chapter 2: Epidemiology of chronic renal failure and renal replacement therapy
P 44 of 204 PDF pages
|
Not a
guideline |
KDIGO
June 2005 |
- Estimating
equations for GFR should:
-
Have been developed in large cohorts, including
a variety of ethnic and racial groups
-
Have been evaluated in an independent cohort
-
Have been validated to have adequate precision
and low bias against gold standard GFR
-
Be practical to implement
- Abbreviated MDRD formula meets most of these criteria
- Cockroft-Gault more difficult to implement in clinical
laboratories
- Both MDRD and Cockroft-Gault are imprecise at high GFR
values
|
In:
Definition of chronic kidney disease: a position statement
from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).
Kidney International, 67, 2089-2100, 2005 |
Position
statement emanating from Controversies Conference (Amsterdam,
the Netherlands, November 16-17, 2004) |