Hemodialysis - Middle Molecule Removal |
|||
Guideline Organization |
Recommendation (Evidence Level) |
Evidence |
Comments |
CARI-Australia |
Careful consideration of high-flux membranes for patients >5 years dialysis (Level III) |
Dialysis adequacy HD |
|
|
|
|
|
EBPG-Europe |
• β2-M representative for large molecules |
Guideline II.2. Hemodialysis dose quantification : middle molecules |
|
KDOQI-US |
• Screening for β2-microglobulin amyloidosis in not recommended (Opinion) |
|
|
UK-Guidelines |
The balance of evidence supports the use of a dialysis regimen with enhanced removal of middle molecules in incident patients who are predicted to remain on HD for several years and prevalent patients who have been on HDfor more than 3.7 years. Such patients are at risk of developing symptoms of dialysis-related amyloidosis. Treatments with better clearance of middle molecules include HD with high flux synthetic membranes and haemodiafiltration. The proven benefits of high flux synthetic membranes in randomized trials are limited to advantages arising from improved biocompatibility and enhanced removal of middle molecules, such as beta-2-microglobulin, rather than better patient survival rates. Chronic high flux dialysis in the HEMO study did not affect the primary outcome of all cause mortality or any of the secondary composite outcome measures including the rates of first cardiac hospitalization or all cause mortality, first infectious hospitalization or all cause mortality, first 15% decrease in serum albumin or all cause mortality, or all non-vascular access-related hospitalizations |
Haemodialysis Guideline – |
|
